It’s been a great “I told you so” week for the censored scientific community.
A new major peer-reviewed study has found that consistent use of ivermectin led to a 100% reduction in hospitalisation rate. It also showed a 92% reduction in mortality rate and an 86% death risk reduction from infection when compared to non-users.
Flávio A. Cadegiani, MD, MSc, PhD, conducted the study encompassing 223,128 individuals from Itajaí, Brazil. He is a board-certified endocrinologist with a master's degree and a doctorate degree in clinical endocrinology.
Those who took the drug regularly, irregularly, and not at all were compared prior to covid infection. The results showed a dose-dependent relationship. There was a clear distinction with non-ivermectin users documenting a “12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin”.
Remember this is what Pierre Kory has been shouting about for a year now (ivmeta.com lists an incredible 82 positive studies from 27 countries):
Yes, back in 2021, the FDA really went all CNN and lambasted the drug by inferring it only applies to horses. In reality, two researchers, William C. Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura, won the Nobel Prize in 2015 for the drug’s effect on parasitic infections back in 2015 (on humans).
Perhaps this is the perfect time to remind you that the FDA is a complete conflict of interest-free entity. Our mistake, the pharmaceutical industry provides 75% of its Drug Review Budget.
For background, earlier this year, an RCT study purported to show that the drug exhibited no “adequate support for the effectiveness (regarding covid infection)”. The authors concluded, “our findings do not support the use of ivermectin to treat mild to severe forms of COVID-19”.
As one would expect, establishment scientists and commentators swiftly took advantage and further vilified the drug. Interestingly enough, the study’s negative conclusion contradicted its clinical benefits. For instance, there were significant benefits associated with the speed of recovery post-infection. Deaths recorded in the ivermectin-treated group were also fewer than those in the placebo group.
Again, this seems like a good time to remind you of the entirely controversial-free foundation upon which the study was conducted. Our mistake, among the study’s authors, was Dr. Andrew Hill, who last year appeared to suggest to Dr. Tess Lawrie that he was the victim of a pressure campaign. In short, he revealed he was in a “sensitive position” in finding certain results with the Bill Gates-funded ivermectin study.
Another study that was splashed across Twitter’s in-app news feed also purported to show negative results concerning hospitalisation. Again, the ivermectin-treated group documented fewer hospitalisations. The study was published in The New England Journal of Medicine back in March 2022 - an “esteemed journal” sponsored directly by pharmaceutical companies.
And how could we forget this:
Thankfully, Joe Rogan got payback:
On a serious note, the media’s reaction to ivermectin was insane. Here was a drug with international acclaim for its antiviral properties and the media complex trashed it as horse paste.
Even establishment Aussie politicians weighed in:
Likewise, the cable “comedians” expressed their deductions:
There was also a doctor in Oklahoma, Jason McElyea, who claimed that emergency rooms in the state were so backed up due to ivermectin overdose cases that “gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities.” That claim, which Twitter allowed to go viral, was completely false.
In summary, there was a full-on coordinated establishment assault. And who stood to benefit? Big Pharma. Pfizer received a reported $5.29 billion from the U.S. government for their oral antiviral paxlovid earlier this year. Something that nicely complimented the $37 billion in vaccine sales they received in 2021.
Where we are in the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) website currently lists these as treatments:
Right at the top, you guessed it, is Paxlovid. With this decisive new study, which, in fact, only builds on what previous (high quality) studies have shown, how much taxpayer money has been wasted on Pfizer’s new antiviral that could have been saved if cheap, generic ivermectin had been used instead? And more to the point, how many of the vulnerable who passed from covid could have been saved if the drug wasn’t politicised?
A recent tweet from Majorie Taylor Greene paints a more suspicious picture:
Dr. Kory backed this up in October 2021 by revealing that he treated Rogan and hundreds of members of Congress with monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, z-pak, NAD, vitamins, and ivermectin. None were hospitalised.
Who were these members we wonder?
As for CNN and Kimmel…
And one for the road…