Arise, King Charles...
Beholden to the people or his purse and pet-projects?
This week marked the end of Britain’s longest-reigning monarch in history. Since her accession in 1952, Queen Elizabeth II reigned for over 70 years - totalling 25,782 days to be exact.
On Thursday, the media had been providing live updates on her condition. One reporter seemed to break ranks announcing the news hours before it “happened”:
Perhaps that gives you a brief insight into how our media really works.
More to the point, even critics would admit, Queen Elizabeth provided a somewhat apolitical bearing. She did not partake in the virtue signalling that many of her children and grandchildren have - emphasis on one particular ginger grandchild there.
But what of the new king? What of now-King Charles?
In short, he is extremely outspoken and highly political compared to his mother. In 2013, it was revealed Charles had held 36 meetings with government ministers in the previous three years. Leaked letters later unveiled the specific discussions. Topics ranged from housing to the preservation of historic buildings and resources for British troops in Iraq. It is safe to say he likes to be active in current affairs.
Extensive research conducted by Winter Oak has further documented his concerning connections to some of the most powerful globalist companies/figures in the world. For instance, his Business in the Community organisation boasts the likes of Accenture, Unilever, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, British Airways, easyJet, Heathrow Airport Limited, Shell UK and BP as members.
One of the organisation’s vice-presidents is Sir Mark Weinberg, a South African-born British financier who co-founded J. Rothschild Assurance, which later became St James’s Place Wealth Management. Among its directors is also Dame Vivian Hunt, a member of the Trilateral Commission set up by American banker David Rockefeller in 1973.
Let us also not forget his ties to Klaus Schwab and the likes of the World Economic Forum. In fact, King Charles’ relationship with Schwab is so strong that he launched ‘The Great Reset’ project back in 2020:
Interestingly enough, Business in the Community shares a similar WEF-like goal demanding that “business must ensure an inclusive digital revolution” and features a ‘Future Leaders Board’ much like Schwab’s ‘Young Global Leaders’ programme.
Another concerning figure connected to King Charles is The Aga Khan, who is the Global Founding Patron of the Prince’s Trust. Khan’s net worth is estimated to be around $13.3 billion, making him one of the world’s fifteen richest “royals” - he is the spiritual leader of some 20 million Ismaili Muslims.
Khan has been placed at the centre of several international scandals. In 2012, reports stated he had been “exonerated” from paying any tax by the country’s former president Nicolas Sarkozy. In 2017, it was discovered that Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau had spent a holiday on Khan’s private Caribbean island. A foundation of Khan’s subsequently received millions in grants from the Canadian government.
Then there are the troubling digital education programs linked to his British Asian Trust. While the Trust purports to help the lives of children in underdeveloped countries, it essentially treats them like financial commodities. In layman’s terms, the British Asian Trust operates a program that calculates a child’s potential (via an education rate card) and then translates that potential into a bond for “stakeholders” to invest in.
As Winter Oak so eloquently puts it: “the lives of these children, bundled together “at scale”, are turned into financial commodities – like the bundles of sub-prime mortgage debts that prompted the 2008 crash – which can be tracked, traced and traded in real-time via 5G/6G and the “inclusive” global digital panopticon”.
In 2014, Charles also sparked a diplomatic row when private comments in which he reportedly likened Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler following Russia's annexation of Crimea were made public. A comparison that bears some potent irony given Charles’s connection to Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and their collective involvement in the WWF.
Researchers discovered Bernhard was a Farben intelligence worker in the Berlin NW7 office - a key Nazi overseas espionage centre created in 1929. Something that later grew into the economic intelligence arm of the Wehrmacht. It is also very hard to forget Charles’s own father, Prince Phillip, was pictured taking part in a Darmstadt Nazi procession in 1937.
Back to the WWF, the organisation has long been accused of land grabbing, throwing indigenous people out while hiding behind a facade of benevolent environmental “conservation”. Charles endorsed an eerily similar-sounding project in 2020. Though critics may suggest he is simply ignorant of the realities despite him being the president of WWF-UK.
Then there was the recent scandal in which The Times revealed that Charles personally accepted suitcases and shopping bags stuffed with millions of dollars’ worth of cash from Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, the former prime minister of Qatar - a country where women must obtain permission from their male guardians to marry, study abroad on government scholarships, work in many government jobs, and travel abroad. The cash was deposited into the Prince of Wales’s Charitable Fund, a grant-making entity that quietly bankrolls his aforementioned projects.
In summary, what we can expect from King Charles is a virtue signaller of the highest order. He’ll likely epitomise the Biden archetype - a leader who’ll shout and scream about being moral and progressive while rubbing shoulders with some of the most corrupt and nefarious individuals to have graced the earth. Someone who will continue to champion WEF-like policy while discounting the draconian realities that they impose on regular people - digital IDs, green taxes, jab surveillance included.
We can only hope we’re wrong.
Bets on the impending photo-op of Charles snacking on some Buggy Charms anyone?
