Dissident Professor Gets Rare Spotlight On The UK Mainstream

Professor Angus Dalgleish warns of link between Covid vaccine and cancers on primetime TalkTV slot

Not often do we witness televised challenges to the Covid vaccine orthodoxy, so this seemed like cause for muted applause.

On Sunday, following the UK's pharmaceutical watchdog’s recent declaration that Pfizer breached the regulatory code five times, including making misleading claims, failing to uphold high standards, and promoting unlicensed medicines, TalkTV host Dr David Bull invited Professor Angus Dalgleish on to discuss the pharmaceutical giant’s mRNA products.

Their discussion prioritised the experience of Dalgleish as a practicing oncologist over data.

His criticisms were very specific. Dalgleish finds unnecessary boosters an enormous problem in that they’re the only explanation for the new and relapsed cancer diagnoses he has witnessed firsthand.

To Bull and Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, he said:

“I was doing a melanoma clinic where I was treating patients with immunotherapy for years and years before it became de rigueur, who were doing exceptionally well, disease-free, having been stage four for five years - one of them was 20 years.

And they relapse and I’m used to looking at this sort of thing. It’s usually excess stress in one’s life for several months. There was none of that… was there anything they’d all had just before the diagnosis? They’d all had an unnecessary booster.

Going back to the myeloma, I then have friends - and you mention the right scenario - I told them I didn’t think it was wise to have the booster and two of them only had it so they could travel.

In both these cases, the people felt awful after having it and ended up being very, very unwell and I insisted they got scanned and they had bone metastases.

Dalgleish revealed he found 8 cases of people who’d had a lymphoma or leukaemia diagnosis after the booster. Something he attributes to the booster because of its capacity to suppress the body’s immune system, specifically our T Cell response.

Now, besides what some of our morbidly ignorant politicians might say about Professor Dalgleish - namely Sir George Howarth - he is far from some old crank.

In fact, he is one of Britain’s eminent oncologists, authoring or co-authoring peer reviewed scientific papers, writing over 70 chapters in medical books, and co-editing five medical books. He also holds a position on the European Commission Cancer Board.

In short, if some “vaxx-me-harder-daddy” reader stumbles across this little article and wants to play the argument from authority card, sorry mate, this ain’t the fight.

While personal testimony provides us with some value, raw data rules. And the raw data in the macro corroborates Professor Dalgleish’s testimony.

In February, The American Cancer Society (ACS) issued a warning about an alarming increase in cancer diagnoses across the United States, totalling over two million cases in the past year alone. A notable proportion involves younger individuals, presenting a worrying trend for health professionals and researchers. William Dahat, the Chief Scientific Officer at the ACS, highlighted that many of these cancers are being detected at more advanced stages, with larger tumours and more aggressive disease characteristics, particularly among patients younger than 50.

Significant rises in cancer cases echoes findings by Phinance Technologies, which conducted a comprehensive analysis of data from the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS). Their report revealed a dramatic increase in disability and mortality rates across all demographics for the years 2021 and 2022, with the most pronounced impact seen in the 15-44 age group.

Check out their adjusted rates for malignant (cancerous) neoplasms (abnormal masses of tissue):

The interview marked a welcome change in the discourse. Besides the odd cameo on GB News and TalkTV, Covid vaccine side effects are rarely discussed. Even Dr Bull himself once advocated mandatory jabs for carers. This was until his mother suffered a myeloma diagnosis immediately following a booster. Since then, he has been raising concerns about side effects intermittently within the framework of a biased communications regulator. Thus far, the link between cancer and Covid vaccine has been no no. But not so much anymore.

His clash with Dr Bharat Pankania on April 23rd 2023 was particularly amusing:

Couple the latter with the aforementioned Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority’s (PMCPA) ruling on Pfizer’s shady marketing conduct plus a looming debate on excess deaths in the House of Commons next week and we may have some shining light at the end of the tunnel.

As time goes on, we are also seeing more compromising studies making their way into the scientific literature. A recent review published in the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules that examined the mRNA Covid vaccine’s inhibition of the body’s essential immunological pathways found:

“It is important to clarify here that mRNA vaccines do not cause cancer; but they could stimulate its development. There is pathologically a distinction to be made between the agents that initiate and promote tumours and malignant conversion vs. those that also/instead promote cancer progression”

Co-chair of the censored HART Group, a group of doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts that “continue to question the science”, Dr Clare Craig, quipped on the matter:

The vehicle that propagates this cancer stimulation is N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ). In simple terms, this is modified RNA technology. Non-modified mRNA vaccines induce opposite results, the same authors declared.

Professor Dalgleish concluded by saying to Bull:

“Some of these people higher up shout at me. ‘What do I know? I’m just an oncologist’. Well, unlike them, I can tell you I sat on the scientific board of a vaccine company that only made messenger RNA vaccine and I knew then there were insuperable problems with safety and yet those have been blasted aside”

You can watch the full interview here: