Overwhelming weight of evidence of bias by OFCOM as Mark Steyn and Dan Wootton have long said. Labour loves Regulators so much and there’s so many of them, maybe Starmer should create OFREG which could regulate the err, Regulators? Nothing will change until a new government gets rid of 95% of the quangos and biased regulators.
For those of you suspicious as to why the BBC's complaint figures are so low - they get special treatment. I would know, I filed a complaint that the BBC then maliciously dropped and Ofcom bailed on.
The BBC is the only one of the group allowed to handle their own complaints up until the highest level. You have to complete every stage of the BBC's obnoxious clusterfuck hurdle-fest where they then maliciously have a one-time form that fails to load at the very end which magically auto-drops the complaint. Only then, after you've gone through that, can you file a complaint to Ofcom.
Who then promptly don't respond.
Ofcom is not impartial. It is rabidly pro-government. And that government is fucking corrupt.
We’ve all complained about the BBC and are well aware of how the system works so they get to mark their own homework. The real question is why are they allowed to get away with this?
So Ofcom can pretend there's far fewer complaints about the BBC on their own records. I guarantee you that complaints list would be larger by a factor of ten if they had to consider them the same way as others.
It was a rhetorical question obviously. But yes I agree there’s inbuilt bias in favour of the BBC by allowing them to mark their own homework apart from leadership bias.
Having a racist (DEI is a racist ideology) in charge of censorship, says it all! I will not read a regulated newspaper and I will not watch regulated tv. Vote with your feet people and tell the journalists why you’re leaving, LOUDLY. Force independence through the only thing they will eventually understand, the cost of their capitulation will be their comfortable livings.
Sensor this Ofcom RFK Jr. is ending Dr. Fauci’s EVIL EXPERIMENTS…
The ‘PANDEMICS’ are coming from Labs.
“I will END ALL gain-of-function research. It's just a disaster. It's given us everything from Lyme disease to COVID and many, many other diseases…” -HHS RFK Jr.
Complaint of Human Rights Violations Due to Government-Sanctioned Sunlight Obstruction and Atmospheric Chemical Dispersal
Complainant:
Full Name: [Your Name]
Address: [Your Address]
Email: [Your Email]
Phone Number: [Optional]
Date: [Insert Date]
Summary of Complaint:
I am filing this complaint to report what I believe to be serious and ongoing violations of my human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, due to the UK Government’s involvement in or approval of geoengineering or solar radiation management (SRM) activities. These activities include the deliberate obstruction of natural sunlight and the dispersal of unknown chemical substances into the atmosphere, carried out without transparency, scientific review, or public consent.
Alleged Violations of My Rights:
1. Article 8 - Right to Respect for Private and Family Life
• My ability to enjoy sunlight, clean air, and a healthy environment has been interfered with by persistent reductions in sunlight and abnormal sky conditions.
• These changes affect my physical and mental health, emotional well-being, and enjoyment of my home and surroundings.
• There has been no public consultation or consent regarding these activities.
2. Article 2 - Right to Life
• Blocking sunlight contributes to vitamin D deficiency and may worsen health issues including Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).
• Chemical dispersals without health warnings or public health protections may endanger human life.
• If risks are known and unaddressed, this may amount to a breach of the government’s duty to protect life.
3. Article 10 - Right to Information and Expression
• I have been denied access to meaningful information about these programs and their potential risks.
• The lack of transparency obstructs public accountability and restricts my ability to make informed decisions.
4. Additional Concern: Lack of Parliamentary Debate or Oversight
• I am not aware of any official parliamentary debate, democratic process, or legislation authorising these activities.
• There appears to be no record of public consultation, environmental risk assessment, or legal approval.
• This raises serious concerns about the lawfulness, necessity, and proportionality of these actions, and about respect for the rule of law.
Evidence Being Collected:
• Air and soil sample results
• Photographs and video documentation of sky conditions and particulate fallout
• Witness statements and public testimonies
• Medical and psychological health impacts
• Freedom of Information requests in progress
Remedies Requested:
1. Immediate suspension of all geoengineering, sunlight obstruction, or atmospheric aerosol activities until independently assessed and publicly authorised.
2. A full and independent investigation into any domestic or international agreements, programs, or activities involving sunlight blocking or chemical dispersal.
3. Public disclosure of all substances used and health and environmental risk assessments conducted.
4. Recognition of these activities as potential human rights violations and implementation of legal safeguards to prevent further breaches.
I respectfully request that the Commission investigates this matter as a matter of urgency. I look forward to your response to the above concerns and to hearing what action will be taken.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter.
We need to advocate strongly for an independent audit of Ofcom's regulatory practices by the National Audit Office.
I'm going to ask Steven Barrett the esteemed Barrister to look into this as he is on record as saying that Ofcom is broken.
Overwhelming weight of evidence of bias by OFCOM as Mark Steyn and Dan Wootton have long said. Labour loves Regulators so much and there’s so many of them, maybe Starmer should create OFREG which could regulate the err, Regulators? Nothing will change until a new government gets rid of 95% of the quangos and biased regulators.
The left-right divide fallacy is old hat. Give it a rest.
"Conservatives" voted for this nonsense bill as well. They all endorse censorship. And genocide. Just as Keir Stormtrooper's financial backers.
https://www.lfi.org.uk/starmer-to-lfi-labour-stands-with-israel/
https://www.declassifieduk.org/israel-lobby-funded-half-of-keir-starmers-cabinet/
Faith in a new government only perpetuates the system.
For those of you suspicious as to why the BBC's complaint figures are so low - they get special treatment. I would know, I filed a complaint that the BBC then maliciously dropped and Ofcom bailed on.
The BBC is the only one of the group allowed to handle their own complaints up until the highest level. You have to complete every stage of the BBC's obnoxious clusterfuck hurdle-fest where they then maliciously have a one-time form that fails to load at the very end which magically auto-drops the complaint. Only then, after you've gone through that, can you file a complaint to Ofcom.
Who then promptly don't respond.
Ofcom is not impartial. It is rabidly pro-government. And that government is fucking corrupt.
We’ve all complained about the BBC and are well aware of how the system works so they get to mark their own homework. The real question is why are they allowed to get away with this?
So Ofcom can pretend there's far fewer complaints about the BBC on their own records. I guarantee you that complaints list would be larger by a factor of ten if they had to consider them the same way as others.
It was a rhetorical question obviously. But yes I agree there’s inbuilt bias in favour of the BBC by allowing them to mark their own homework apart from leadership bias.
Having a racist (DEI is a racist ideology) in charge of censorship, says it all! I will not read a regulated newspaper and I will not watch regulated tv. Vote with your feet people and tell the journalists why you’re leaving, LOUDLY. Force independence through the only thing they will eventually understand, the cost of their capitulation will be their comfortable livings.
Sensor this Ofcom RFK Jr. is ending Dr. Fauci’s EVIL EXPERIMENTS…
The ‘PANDEMICS’ are coming from Labs.
“I will END ALL gain-of-function research. It's just a disaster. It's given us everything from Lyme disease to COVID and many, many other diseases…” -HHS RFK Jr.
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
Human Rights complaint - please share widely
Send by post, or email to: [email protected]
To:
Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)
Fleetbank House
2-6 Salisbury Square
London
EC4Y 8JX
www.equalityhumanrights.com
Subject:
Complaint of Human Rights Violations Due to Government-Sanctioned Sunlight Obstruction and Atmospheric Chemical Dispersal
Complainant:
Full Name: [Your Name]
Address: [Your Address]
Email: [Your Email]
Phone Number: [Optional]
Date: [Insert Date]
Summary of Complaint:
I am filing this complaint to report what I believe to be serious and ongoing violations of my human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, due to the UK Government’s involvement in or approval of geoengineering or solar radiation management (SRM) activities. These activities include the deliberate obstruction of natural sunlight and the dispersal of unknown chemical substances into the atmosphere, carried out without transparency, scientific review, or public consent.
Alleged Violations of My Rights:
1. Article 8 - Right to Respect for Private and Family Life
• My ability to enjoy sunlight, clean air, and a healthy environment has been interfered with by persistent reductions in sunlight and abnormal sky conditions.
• These changes affect my physical and mental health, emotional well-being, and enjoyment of my home and surroundings.
• There has been no public consultation or consent regarding these activities.
2. Article 2 - Right to Life
• Blocking sunlight contributes to vitamin D deficiency and may worsen health issues including Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).
• Chemical dispersals without health warnings or public health protections may endanger human life.
• If risks are known and unaddressed, this may amount to a breach of the government’s duty to protect life.
3. Article 10 - Right to Information and Expression
• I have been denied access to meaningful information about these programs and their potential risks.
• The lack of transparency obstructs public accountability and restricts my ability to make informed decisions.
4. Additional Concern: Lack of Parliamentary Debate or Oversight
• I am not aware of any official parliamentary debate, democratic process, or legislation authorising these activities.
• There appears to be no record of public consultation, environmental risk assessment, or legal approval.
• This raises serious concerns about the lawfulness, necessity, and proportionality of these actions, and about respect for the rule of law.
Evidence Being Collected:
• Air and soil sample results
• Photographs and video documentation of sky conditions and particulate fallout
• Witness statements and public testimonies
• Medical and psychological health impacts
• Freedom of Information requests in progress
Remedies Requested:
1. Immediate suspension of all geoengineering, sunlight obstruction, or atmospheric aerosol activities until independently assessed and publicly authorised.
2. A full and independent investigation into any domestic or international agreements, programs, or activities involving sunlight blocking or chemical dispersal.
3. Public disclosure of all substances used and health and environmental risk assessments conducted.
4. Recognition of these activities as potential human rights violations and implementation of legal safeguards to prevent further breaches.
I respectfully request that the Commission investigates this matter as a matter of urgency. I look forward to your response to the above concerns and to hearing what action will be taken.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email Address]
[Your Phone Number - optional]
So Ofcom is really OFFwithGBNews