He's been open about his past and his efforts to be a better human. What proof is there that he's been dishonest? He does appear to have the "look at me" aspect of narcissism but without me knowing the degree, that doesn't mean that Narcissist defines him. The counterweight is that his empathy seems sincere. There is a difference between…
He's been open about his past and his efforts to be a better human. What proof is there that he's been dishonest? He does appear to have the "look at me" aspect of narcissism but without me knowing the degree, that doesn't mean that Narcissist defines him. The counterweight is that his empathy seems sincere. There is a difference between his over-the-top monologues versus him sanely and cleverly interviewing people.
But onto the meat which is you saying "There is copius amounts of evidence that he being used by the powers that be to lead and control a narrative to a subset of the opposition."
Where is that?
Then you say: "Look, I'll agree that this takes a quite open mind, and many are not ready to see it yet, I don't mean that to be patronising, we have all been at the stage where we can't get our heads around this, right up to the day when we do finally get our head around it. "
I interpret that as patronising. Maybe I'm sensitive because the life I had was destroyed fighting corruption. I know conspiracies are real, and have been subjected to that by my government to silence me. I know 100% what its like to be on the receiving end of sex propaganda. That doesn't make me biased to conspiracy because fake ones detract from the real ones. My mind is open to what can be proved.
I have no intention of arguing with or patronising you Mike, I have read your bio and I have nothing but respect for what you are doing in SA and wish you well. Being in the UK I have followed his career since the outset. For what its worth I used to find him mildly amusing, then completely annoying and peverted, then a few years back I noticed he had changed considerably and was even a keen listener of his podcast.
You clearly haven't seen the Mark Devlin film that I also linked, which is where much of the evidence lies. I have no idea where you sit with the occult, I have been opening my mind to the occult for the last 5 years but it took the whole Covid BS to open my eyes fully to the evil in this world. Again, feel free to disagree.
I really didn't mean to be patronising, its just that, knowing how long it took me to accept how this world works (as I perceive it), I can appreciate how long it can take to see things differently.
But you ask for evidence of why he is controlled oposition and I feel I have supplied all you need. I'm not here to argue, feel free to disagree and continue the good work you are doing. I think we probably agree on far far more than that which we disagree.
He's been open about his past and his efforts to be a better human. What proof is there that he's been dishonest? He does appear to have the "look at me" aspect of narcissism but without me knowing the degree, that doesn't mean that Narcissist defines him. The counterweight is that his empathy seems sincere. There is a difference between his over-the-top monologues versus him sanely and cleverly interviewing people.
But onto the meat which is you saying "There is copius amounts of evidence that he being used by the powers that be to lead and control a narrative to a subset of the opposition."
Where is that?
Then you say: "Look, I'll agree that this takes a quite open mind, and many are not ready to see it yet, I don't mean that to be patronising, we have all been at the stage where we can't get our heads around this, right up to the day when we do finally get our head around it. "
I interpret that as patronising. Maybe I'm sensitive because the life I had was destroyed fighting corruption. I know conspiracies are real, and have been subjected to that by my government to silence me. I know 100% what its like to be on the receiving end of sex propaganda. That doesn't make me biased to conspiracy because fake ones detract from the real ones. My mind is open to what can be proved.
Stark listed valuable points. Counter them.
I have no intention of arguing with or patronising you Mike, I have read your bio and I have nothing but respect for what you are doing in SA and wish you well. Being in the UK I have followed his career since the outset. For what its worth I used to find him mildly amusing, then completely annoying and peverted, then a few years back I noticed he had changed considerably and was even a keen listener of his podcast.
You clearly haven't seen the Mark Devlin film that I also linked, which is where much of the evidence lies. I have no idea where you sit with the occult, I have been opening my mind to the occult for the last 5 years but it took the whole Covid BS to open my eyes fully to the evil in this world. Again, feel free to disagree.
I really didn't mean to be patronising, its just that, knowing how long it took me to accept how this world works (as I perceive it), I can appreciate how long it can take to see things differently.
But you ask for evidence of why he is controlled oposition and I feel I have supplied all you need. I'm not here to argue, feel free to disagree and continue the good work you are doing. I think we probably agree on far far more than that which we disagree.