These progressive liberal judges will be the death of UK. They will someday learn to regret their decisions when harm comes to a family member or friend. If Britain doesn’t turn around their immigration policies soon, it will be too late if not already past. A country can only submit to this lunacy for so long before the immigrants take over completely or the British people stand up and revolt.
It is hard to believe that these judges and lawyers passed their exams. It sure isn’t impartial, famous British Justice. It is more like the kind of injustice that exists where these illegal refugees come from.
as an aside and off topic be sure to check out and read carefully a petition on the uk government and parliament petition page....call an immediate general election....it currently has 877,290,, signatures it urgently needs many more and YOU can help in getting them first be sure to sign it and most importantly be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk england/wales/northern ireland/ scotland/... with as many like minded people as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you to do
On one level it's hardly surprising that part-time judges spend the rest of their time practicing in their field of expertise. I am currently involved in litigation over a piece of land and my solicitor has instructed a barrister who sits part-time as a Land Tribunal judge. I'm pleased about that. The Tribunals are by nature specialist fora and it would be crazy to appoint a tax barrister to sit as a judge in the Employment Tribunal.
However, the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal is politically charged because, unlike the Land Tribunal for example, the cases are not between two parties of equal status. One party is always the Government and all cases are seeking an outcome in one direction - no-one ever appears at the Tribunal seeking permission to leave the country.
In these circumstances, the JAC and judicial conduct authorities must be highly alert to potential problems. I would suggest any judge who allows over, say, 30% of appeals should be subject to official scrutiny.
These progressive liberal judges will be the death of UK. They will someday learn to regret their decisions when harm comes to a family member or friend. If Britain doesn’t turn around their immigration policies soon, it will be too late if not already past. A country can only submit to this lunacy for so long before the immigrants take over completely or the British people stand up and revolt.
It is hard to believe that these judges and lawyers passed their exams. It sure isn’t impartial, famous British Justice. It is more like the kind of injustice that exists where these illegal refugees come from.
as an aside and off topic be sure to check out and read carefully a petition on the uk government and parliament petition page....call an immediate general election....it currently has 877,290,, signatures it urgently needs many more and YOU can help in getting them first be sure to sign it and most importantly be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk england/wales/northern ireland/ scotland/... with as many like minded people as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you to do
Outrageous bias!
Thankyou for exposing the rot of Britain´s criminal justice system.
What an odd-looking assemblage of ‘judges’. Perhaps bullying at school brought them to their evil treachery.
They’re all traitors.
True justice - bring back the rope.
On one level it's hardly surprising that part-time judges spend the rest of their time practicing in their field of expertise. I am currently involved in litigation over a piece of land and my solicitor has instructed a barrister who sits part-time as a Land Tribunal judge. I'm pleased about that. The Tribunals are by nature specialist fora and it would be crazy to appoint a tax barrister to sit as a judge in the Employment Tribunal.
However, the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal is politically charged because, unlike the Land Tribunal for example, the cases are not between two parties of equal status. One party is always the Government and all cases are seeking an outcome in one direction - no-one ever appears at the Tribunal seeking permission to leave the country.
In these circumstances, the JAC and judicial conduct authorities must be highly alert to potential problems. I would suggest any judge who allows over, say, 30% of appeals should be subject to official scrutiny.
This is profoundly important work which justifies greater distribution. Bless you.