I must admit it do shake my head at all the 'informed' people calling the UK COVID inquiry a ''whitewash'' many of whom have likely never watched a full oral session nor read a single witness statement and whereby i do see where they are coming from that is NOT the whole story. I also find it intruiging the 'vaccine' conference got under…
I must admit it do shake my head at all the 'informed' people calling the UK COVID inquiry a ''whitewash'' many of whom have likely never watched a full oral session nor read a single witness statement and whereby i do see where they are coming from that is NOT the whole story. I also find it intruiging the 'vaccine' conference got underway the same week as the preliminary hearing for MODULE 6 CARE HOMES at the UK COVID inquiry commenced which revealled some shocking evidence but curious minds were drawn elsewhere. We should never forget who died the most in 2020 to start 'the pandemic.' No 'medical freedom' group or COVID sceptic is taking this on but we've had 4 YEARS of 'vaccine' concern despite 13 billion injections administered globally and the majority of people are not even offered the injection in 2025 nor would many accept for various reasons. If people were really serious about stopping jabs they'd be digging into the roots.
Alice Irving-Disabled People’s Organisation @ UK COVID inquiry ''whitewash''
‘‘Adult social care users were at the sharp end of the misuse of DNACPRs..From March-Sept 2020 there was a marked increase in the number of people with DNACPRs in adult social care settings and nursing homes despite there being no guidance suggesting their use should increase.’’
-Ongoing negative impacts
-Healthcare withdrawn
-One of the first decisions taken was to ease social care responsibility
-Safeguards ineffective
-Human rights abused
-Most basic needs unmet below ‘‘minimum acceptable’’ standard
-Misuse DNACPR notices
-225% increase in mortality in at home deaths from March-June 2020
Seems popular COVID ''dissent'' is also within a limited spectrum of debate ironically the same approach is employed by lawyers at the UK COVID inquiry.
I must admit it do shake my head at all the 'informed' people calling the UK COVID inquiry a ''whitewash'' many of whom have likely never watched a full oral session nor read a single witness statement and whereby i do see where they are coming from that is NOT the whole story. I also find it intruiging the 'vaccine' conference got underway the same week as the preliminary hearing for MODULE 6 CARE HOMES at the UK COVID inquiry commenced which revealled some shocking evidence but curious minds were drawn elsewhere. We should never forget who died the most in 2020 to start 'the pandemic.' No 'medical freedom' group or COVID sceptic is taking this on but we've had 4 YEARS of 'vaccine' concern despite 13 billion injections administered globally and the majority of people are not even offered the injection in 2025 nor would many accept for various reasons. If people were really serious about stopping jabs they'd be digging into the roots.
Alice Irving-Disabled People’s Organisation @ UK COVID inquiry ''whitewash''
‘‘Adult social care users were at the sharp end of the misuse of DNACPRs..From March-Sept 2020 there was a marked increase in the number of people with DNACPRs in adult social care settings and nursing homes despite there being no guidance suggesting their use should increase.’’
-Ongoing negative impacts
-Healthcare withdrawn
-One of the first decisions taken was to ease social care responsibility
-Safeguards ineffective
-Human rights abused
-Most basic needs unmet below ‘‘minimum acceptable’’ standard
-Misuse DNACPR notices
-225% increase in mortality in at home deaths from March-June 2020
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/notes
Seems popular COVID ''dissent'' is also within a limited spectrum of debate ironically the same approach is employed by lawyers at the UK COVID inquiry.