Product liability claim🤔 how do the EUA status impact the suit? Or did England remove or change AstraZ's product status? My understanding is that while it was recalled or taken off availability in some countries due to risk, it hadn't had it's EUA status revoked, which means the contractual protections would still be in effect, which wa…
Product liability claim🤔 how do the EUA status impact the suit? Or did England remove or change AstraZ's product status? My understanding is that while it was recalled or taken off availability in some countries due to risk, it hadn't had it's EUA status revoked, which means the contractual protections would still be in effect, which was they couldn't be held liable unless it was proven they intentionally created a defective product or fraudulently. Excuse my ignorance on UK pharmaceutical regulations.🙏🙏
No you're spot on. That got me too. Possibly when the Govt suspended use that meant the EUA was naturally revoked. Trying to get my hands on the court papers so I can see the specific arguments.
Product liability claim🤔 how do the EUA status impact the suit? Or did England remove or change AstraZ's product status? My understanding is that while it was recalled or taken off availability in some countries due to risk, it hadn't had it's EUA status revoked, which means the contractual protections would still be in effect, which was they couldn't be held liable unless it was proven they intentionally created a defective product or fraudulently. Excuse my ignorance on UK pharmaceutical regulations.🙏🙏
No you're spot on. That got me too. Possibly when the Govt suspended use that meant the EUA was naturally revoked. Trying to get my hands on the court papers so I can see the specific arguments.